hocus often refers to board rules even though he appears to be in opposition to the board owner/operator. I asked him where these rules are, but he seems to have missed the question.
How can a board operator violate the rules his own board? Aren't his actions de facto rules? hocus appears to perceive this differently as if the United Peoples of Community convened and ratifed a set of rules to be used at all boards that use the phrase "early retirement", "retire early", "SWR" or any hocus-coined related terms.
Okay, that was rambling, but the unanswered question is "where are these rules you keep referring to?"