NoFeeBoards.com!

No Fees! No Ads! No Spam!

Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search NoFeeBoards.com! Forum Index

How will you use a "new/improved" swr analysis
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NoFeeBoards.com! Forum Index » FIRE Board
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which comes closest to your outlook regarding the planned inflation adjusted "best" swr.
I will bank on it
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
undecided, some of both, don't like the other responses
15%
 15%  [ 2 ]
I will consider it as one factor among many
84%
 84%  [ 11 ]
Total Votes : 13

Author Message
gummy
*** Veteran


Joined: 14 May 2003
Posts: 107
Location: Hogsville, ON

PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wanderer:
Quote:
If I provide chapter and verse, I am engaging in "game-playing" (right?).

Why do you assume that I'm talking about you?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
[KenM]
*** Veteran


Joined: 04 Mar 2003
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I don't enjoy participating until I know what the discussion is about......I feel like asking the participants to define "avita-gargoyle" and "certo-mosivich", feeling that, if they could, the definitions themselves would settle the issue.

.....but if you know what the discussion is about.....and you could quickly settle the issue.....dosn't that spoil the fun of the debate?
The zen of SWRs (contemplation of one's essential nature to the exclusion of all else is the only way of achieving pure enlightenment ) CoolCoolCool
Quote:
I don't understand why anybuddy would argue that some SWR is "95% safe" ...

I admit I've probably been guilty of saying "95% safe" Embarassed....but only as shorthand for some sort of long phrase using long words like probability......Sam and Sally would understand?



_________________
KenM
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gummy
*** Veteran


Joined: 14 May 2003
Posts: 107
Location: Hogsville, ON

PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KenM ... you're one wise fella Shocked

"zen of SWRs", eh?
Gotta put that here:
http://home.golden.net/~pjponzo/SWR-3.htm


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
wanderer
*** Veteran


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 363
Location: anytown, usa

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In particular, are we talking about a "safe" withdrawal rate calculation for:

[1] the person who's just retired? If so, is it to be some fixed SWR (until he drops dead)?
[2] Is it for the person who's planning to retire in 30 years (and contributing monthly to her portfolio)? If so, is she supposed to reevaluate periodically and readjust her investments in light of a newly calculated SWR?
[3] Are we looking for a "method of calculation" (for either/both [1]/[2]) or are we looking for a definition of "safe" or are we looking for a "current" SWR calculation or ... ***

I think this is a useful distinction. It sounds like most folks should plan on being able to absorb a 50% haircut. We are planning on being able to absorb a 75% haircut.

I hope folks will continue to pursue the various angles. That being said, I'm not sure how useful the SWR stuff is.

Pregunta: "What's the SWR?"

Antwort: "Pretty frickin' low, whatever it is."

Maybe it's just another way of saying flexibility is critical for survival. Maybe I just worked waaay too long...



_________________
regards,

wanderer

The field has eyes / the wood has ears / I will see / be silent and hear
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ataloss
**** Heavy Hitter


Joined: 25 Nov 2002
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I occurred to me that (based on 1966/Bernstein) if I split a 1M portfolio and took 4% inflation adjusted withdrawals from half and 5% variable withdrawls from the other half my minimum real takeout would have been 30k in 1974 but would have been above 40 k for a number of years at the beginning and end of the 30 year period. I think flexibility is important Wink

http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/998/hell.htm



_________________
Have fun.

Ataloss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JWR1945
***** Legend


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 1697
Location: Crestview, Florida

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wanderer
Quote:
I think this is a useful distinction. It sounds like most folks should plan on being able to absorb a 50% haircut. We are planning on being able to absorb a 75% haircut.

I hope folks will continue to pursue the various angles. That being said, I'm not sure how useful the SWR stuff is.

Pregunta: "What's the SWR?"

Antwort: "Pretty frickin' low, whatever it is."

Maybe it's just another way of saying flexibility is critical for survival. Maybe I just worked waaay too long...

If you think in terms of a single number for making withdrawals and/or a single number for an allocation, SWR research is not that useful. If you are looking for insights and understandings, it is quite valuable.

It is similar to accounting. It is not a single snapshot that is so important. It is the story that you learn from looking at a series of snapshots.

Consider what KenM and ben are telling us. They would never dream of calculating a single number and then gritting their teeth and closing their eyes from then on. That is radically different than what we would have expected to hear less than one year ago. They have benefited greatly by their past ignorance! They did not learn the wrong lessons.

That in itself is tremendous progress. The fact that people are looking at a large variety of approaches shows tremendous progress.

Have fun.

John R.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ataloss
**** Heavy Hitter


Joined: 25 Nov 2002
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2003 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
They would never dream of calculating a single number and then gritting their teeth and closing their eyes from then on. That is radically different than what we would have expected to hear less than one year ago.


Although I think this excessive reliance on a definitive swr would not have occurred if people listen to Bogle (and others) link from Stubblejumper in post 787:
Quote:
"The first step is to measure what can be easily measured. This is okay as far as it goes. The second step is to disregard that which cannot be measured, or give it an arbitrary quantitative value. This is artificial and misleading. The third step is to presume that what cannot be measured really is not very important. This is blindness. The fourth step is to say that what cannot be measured does not really exist. This is suicide."


http://www.vanguard.com/bogle_site/sp20021018.html



_________________
Have fun.

Ataloss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbphd
* Rookie


Joined: 24 Dec 2002
Posts: 6
Location: Montecito, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just came from reading postings on TMF FIRE board, and was refreshed by the absense of this pointless debate. Now I see a really excellent board in danger of being despoiled. I contend that the only true SWR is exactly 3.26595% and that exactly 5 billion angels can dance on the head of a pin. So there's the one true answer.

db


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ben
*** Veteran


Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Posts: 231
Location: The world is not enough

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2003 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi JWR,
A year ago I would have said exactly the same thing - so not really enlightenend (but maybe re-confirmed?) by the looong SWR chats here.

I used my simple 50% stock/50% bond historical avg. performance 8% - inflation (3-4%) leading to the 4% SWR. This method has lots of holes as already discussed in the Ben's SWR "study" post - but combined with the traditional SWR studys and COMMON SENSE/flexibility when actually implement the withdrawals, it is a good as it gets for me. Very Happy



_________________
Normal; to put on clothes bought for work, go to work in car bought to get to work needed to pay for the clothes, the car and the home left empty all day in order to afford to live in it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ataloss
**** Heavy Hitter


Joined: 25 Nov 2002
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hocus took offense at the idea that there were alternatives to deciding on a fixed % of assets withdrawal and then adjusting for inflation
Quote:
Why adjust for inflation, Ataloss? And why adjust for volatility? Ignore those factors and you can report a SWR of about 10 percent. Isn't that a lot better than 4 percent?


but hocus seemed comfortable taking a withdrawal from a 100% fixed income portfolio that exceeded the earnings
Quote:
While I use a 4 percent annual return assumption, you'll note that most of my investments do not earn a full 4 percent. The CDs do because they were purchsed at high yields (many between 6 and 7 percent) that result in a real return over 4 percent in today's low-inflation environment.) But the ibonds are at 3.4 percent and the TIPS at 3.5 percent.

I make up this difference with a technique I think of as "the personal inflation rate." The inflation adjustment for the TIPS and ibonds are done according to government estimates of inflation. For purposes of my own records, I use a personal inflation measure instead.


http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=17246781

interesting



_________________
Have fun.

Ataloss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NoFeeBoards.com! Forum Index » FIRE Board All times are GMT - 9 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
Designed for Trushkin.net | Styles Database