What about NFB threads to cite in the FAQ
What about NFB threads to cite in the FAQ
What threads could be of use to newcomers?
I would prefer to stay away from any that consist of ranting about some other board.
I would prefer to stay away from any that consist of ranting about some other board.
Last edited by ataloss on Tue Sep 23, 2003 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss
or even threads to keep handy for non-newcomers
I looked at the reversion to mean thread
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=324#p324
but it isn't the same w/o the graphics
I looked at the reversion to mean thread
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=324#p324
but it isn't the same w/o the graphics
Last edited by ataloss on Tue Sep 23, 2003 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss
Well, there is always gummy's url:
http://home.golden.net/~pjponzo/gummy_stuff.htm
And dory's calculator (yes, dory is a man. A dory is a kind of boat.)
http://www.early-retirement.org/fire/
dory's retire early homepage:
http://www.early-retirement.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl
And if it isn't too offputting (and I don't know why it should be) - John Greaney's homepage:
http://www.retireearlyhomepage.com/
And taxes! I'll think about that tomorrow.
karma
http://home.golden.net/~pjponzo/gummy_stuff.htm
And dory's calculator (yes, dory is a man. A dory is a kind of boat.)
http://www.early-retirement.org/fire/
dory's retire early homepage:
http://www.early-retirement.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl
And if it isn't too offputting (and I don't know why it should be) - John Greaney's homepage:
http://www.retireearlyhomepage.com/
And taxes! I'll think about that tomorrow.
karma
-
- ** Regular
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 3:59 am
- Location: Florida
What threads could be of use to newcomers?
I would prefer to stay away from any that consist of ranting about some other board.
I don't see why someone couldn't cut and paste from existing threads to create new threads that contain only the meat from important posts and leaves out the chaff. ES could then "close" the post so no one else could post to it. That way we could create a series of threads that could be assembled into a FAQ.
Am I thinking wrong? It sure seems like this would work. We could essentially create a group of tutorials on whatever topic we like.
WiseNLucky
I just wish everyone could step back and get less car and less house then they want, and realize they don't NEED more. -- NeuroFool
I just wish everyone could step back and get less car and less house then they want, and realize they don't NEED more. -- NeuroFool
I liked wanderer's practical fire analysis
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... ight=#p521
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... ight=#p521
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss
suggestions? additions? more recent better posts?
Interesting NFB Threads
Wanderer's practical fire analysis
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... ight=#p521
JWR Fire Thresholds
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=129
Raddr on the unlucky Y2K retiree
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=770#p770
Raddr on the importance of the sequence of returns
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=119
Bensolar and valuation effect on swr
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 1046#p1046
and
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 3005#p3005
andrew61 and Terhorsts
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 3253#p3253
life expectancy and swr
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 5860#p5860
JWR and market timing
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 5071#p5071
FMO Gary Eldred and Real Estate
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1185
Gordon Eq and future returns by raddr
http://www.nofeeboards.com/boards/viewt ... 8629#p8629
Therealchips the utility of money and personal life expectancy
http://www.nofeeboards.com/boards/viewt ... 7126#p7126
Interesting NFB Threads
Wanderer's practical fire analysis
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... ight=#p521
JWR Fire Thresholds
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=129
Raddr on the unlucky Y2K retiree
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=770#p770
Raddr on the importance of the sequence of returns
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=119
Bensolar and valuation effect on swr
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 1046#p1046
and
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 3005#p3005
andrew61 and Terhorsts
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 3253#p3253
life expectancy and swr
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 5860#p5860
JWR and market timing
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic ... 5071#p5071
FMO Gary Eldred and Real Estate
http://nofeeboards.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1185
Gordon Eq and future returns by raddr
http://www.nofeeboards.com/boards/viewt ... 8629#p8629
Therealchips the utility of money and personal life expectancy
http://www.nofeeboards.com/boards/viewt ... 7126#p7126
Last edited by ataloss on Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:53 am, edited 4 times in total.
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss
I don't see why someone couldn't cut and paste from existing threads to create new threads that contain only the meat from important posts and leaves out the chaff.
I don't think jwr and hocus would like my idea of chaff (5000 word rants mentioning intercst a dozen times. ) Indeed, jwr has taken great offense at my withdrawal of the offer made to link to the good hocus posts from tmf- An offer extended to no other poster
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss
ataloss -
be sure to include a link to the locked thread.
also, please make sure there is a link to your posts, around the time preceding Ed Easterling's visit, citing evidence that hocus definitely didn't 'know it all' from the beginning.
Your clarification of matters caused hocus great mortification, but I considered it a public service (rather than the entire community being embarassed by his inaccurate pronouncements).
Oh, before hocus cries 'smear: his confusing real return with SWR, hocus' confusion over what William Bernstein was asserting with mathematical certitude, hocus' assertion that he was the first to marry SWRs and valuation, and his assertion that thread disruption only came from the anti-valuation crowd have been demonstrated to be objectively false (or 'invalid', if anyone prefers).
does hocus realize his bizarre approach to building a case now has me actually defending the rehp approach? Good lord!
be sure to include a link to the locked thread.
also, please make sure there is a link to your posts, around the time preceding Ed Easterling's visit, citing evidence that hocus definitely didn't 'know it all' from the beginning.
Your clarification of matters caused hocus great mortification, but I considered it a public service (rather than the entire community being embarassed by his inaccurate pronouncements).
Oh, before hocus cries 'smear: his confusing real return with SWR, hocus' confusion over what William Bernstein was asserting with mathematical certitude, hocus' assertion that he was the first to marry SWRs and valuation, and his assertion that thread disruption only came from the anti-valuation crowd have been demonstrated to be objectively false (or 'invalid', if anyone prefers).
does hocus realize his bizarre approach to building a case now has me actually defending the rehp approach? Good lord!
regards,
wanderer
The field has eyes / the wood has ears / I will see / be silent and hear
wanderer
The field has eyes / the wood has ears / I will see / be silent and hear
Hi wanderer, I have been reluctant to put in links to some of those threads. Although jwr and hocus would disagree (by definition) I am trying not to be unnecessarily argumentative.
I will respond to hocus and I am working on another generic hocus post.
I am particularly interested in the planned faq for the swr research board. I was wondering if it will include some sort of pledge that prospective posters there need to make before participation . More than one poster has mistakenly assumed that they could express opinions
I will respond to hocus and I am working on another generic hocus post.
I am particularly interested in the planned faq for the swr research board. I was wondering if it will include some sort of pledge that prospective posters there need to make before participation . More than one poster has mistakenly assumed that they could express opinions
Have fun.
Ataloss
Ataloss