Search found 5 matches

by galagan
Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:58 am
Forum: SWR Research Group
Topic: Same valuation but not as safe
Replies: 2
Views: 8062

What is different today is that dividend payout ratios are much lower than they have been in the past. If one assumes that corporations reinvest retained earnings at least as well as investors reinvest their dividends...which is a major league assumption in itself, then the total return from stocks...
by galagan
Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:14 pm
Forum: FIRE Board
Topic: Safe withdrawal ideas, thoughts and provocations
Replies: 107
Views: 71194

Now it may be that cloud patterns can be used to help you assess whether it will rain tomorrow. However, if it has been establshed beyond any reasonable doubt that wind velocity also plays a role, then a weather analysis that does not consider the wind velocity factor is an invalid analysis. That w...
by galagan
Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:44 pm
Forum: FIRE Board
Topic: Looking deeply into the SWR Equation
Replies: 31
Views: 23418

John, I've enjoyed the analysis, although I fear that it may be difficult for new board members to follow discussions here, given the speed with which new ideas flow from old ones. If you weren't part of all the conversations that came before, it's hard to catch up! I'll throw a few questions in to ...
by galagan
Fri May 30, 2003 7:28 am
Forum: FIRE Board
Topic: The Great SWR Investigation-Part 2
Replies: 128
Views: 82087

I must be slow, but, so that I might (more clearly) understand the point you're making (regarding mathematically generated SWR s), maybe we could agree that any mathematical prescription requires numbers (as inputs) and spits out a SWR . To put it another way, I would always want to understand what...
by galagan
Tue May 27, 2003 7:57 am
Forum: FIRE Board
Topic: Future Proceedings on the SWR Matter
Replies: 21
Views: 19288

JWR1945 has independently calculated the SWR for the year 2000 and come to a number very close to the number that Bernstein came to. I believe that JWR1945's number was 2.3 percent. Could someone please point me to JWR1945's calculations and discussion of his methodology? thanks, dan